Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

No Deemed Guilt for SHOs on Illicit Liquor Seizures: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar

No Deemed Guilt for SHOs on Illicit Liquor Seizures: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar

Date: Dec 13, 2025
No Deemed Guilt for SHOs Merely from Illicit Liquor Seizures in Their Jurisdiction: Commentary on Bhola Kumar Singh v. State of Bihar, Patna High Court (10.12.2025) I. Introduction The Patna High...
Overriding Effect of the Family Courts Act over Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act in Matrimonial Declarations: Commentary on Anjani Kumar @ Pappu Kumar v. Mamta Bharti

Overriding Effect of the Family Courts Act over Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act in Matrimonial Declarations: Commentary on Anjani Kumar @ Pappu Kumar v. Mamta Bharti

Date: Dec 6, 2025
Overriding Effect of the Family Courts Act over Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act in Matrimonial Declarations Commentary on: Anjani Kumar @ Pappu Kumar v. Mamta Bharti & Anr Patna High Court,...
Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar

Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar

Date: Dec 1, 2025
Foundational Facts, Child Witness Competency and the Limits of Section 29 POCSO Presumption: Commentary on Jai Krishna Yadav v. State of Bihar 1. Introduction The Division Bench of the Patna High...
Parity and Prolonged Custody Do Not Dilute the UAPA Bail Bar: Commentary on Anwar Rashid v. Union Bank of India (NIA)

Parity and Prolonged Custody Do Not Dilute the UAPA Bail Bar: Commentary on Anwar Rashid v. Union Bank of India (NIA)

Date: Nov 25, 2025
Parity and Prolonged Custody Do Not Dilute the UAPA Bail Bar: A Commentary on Anwar Rashid v. The Union Bank of India through National Investigation Agency I. Introduction The Patna High Court’s...
Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel: Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram (Patna High Court, 19 November 2025)

Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel: Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram (Patna High Court, 19 November 2025)

Date: Nov 20, 2025
Retrospective Parity in Additional Salary for Vigilance Police Personnel Commentary on The State of Bihar v. Satya Narayan Ram, Patna High Court, LPA No. 485 of 2022 (Judgment dated 19 November 2025)...
Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles: Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of Bihar

Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles: Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 19, 2025
Speculative Apprehension and Multiple FIRs Cannot Defeat Statutory Presumption of Bail for Juveniles under Section 12 JJ Act, 2015 – Commentary on Banti Kumar @ Aryan Raj @ Hunter Yadav v. State of...
When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences

When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences

Date: Nov 11, 2025
When Section 60 Cannot Apply: Patna High Court’s Writ Power to Release Vehicles Not Used in Prohibition Offences I. Introduction The decision in Karnal Kumar v. State of Bihar through the Principal...
Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Mandatory Age Determination under JJ Act and the Limited Scope of Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Cases: Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 4, 2025
Mandatory Age Determination under the Juvenile Justice Act and the “Possible View” Test in Appeals Against Acquittal in POCSO Prosecutions: A Commentary on Annapurna Jajodiya v. State of Bihar, Patna...
Anticipatory Bail Remains Maintainable Despite Proclamation under BNSS Sections 84/85: Patna High Court’s “Serious Consideration, Not Embargo” Standard

Anticipatory Bail Remains Maintainable Despite Proclamation under BNSS Sections 84/85: Patna High Court’s “Serious Consideration, Not Embargo” Standard

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Anticipatory Bail Remains Maintainable Despite Proclamation under BNSS Sections 84/85: Patna High Court’s “Serious Consideration, Not Embargo” Standard Introduction This commentary analyzes the...
Unauthorized possession of low‑codeine cough syrups falls under the NDPS regulatory net: Patna High Court applies Hira Singh mixture rule and Section 37 bail bar

Unauthorized possession of low‑codeine cough syrups falls under the NDPS regulatory net: Patna High Court applies Hira Singh mixture rule and Section 37 bail bar

Date: Aug 28, 2025
Unauthorized possession of low‑codeine cough syrups falls under the NDPS regulatory net: Patna High Court applies Hira Singh mixture rule and Section 37 bail bar Case: Nilendra Kumar Karan @ Nilendra...
Unnamed Accused Identified Only by Relationship: Conviction Unsustainable Without TIP, Physical Description, and IO Evidence — Commentary on Haresh Yadav v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court, 22 Aug 2025)

Unnamed Accused Identified Only by Relationship: Conviction Unsustainable Without TIP, Physical Description, and IO Evidence — Commentary on Haresh Yadav v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court, 22 Aug 2025)

Date: Aug 23, 2025
Unnamed Accused Identified Only by Relationship: Conviction Unsustainable Without TIP, Physical Description, and IO Evidence Commentary on Haresh Yadav v. State of Bihar (Patna High Court, 22 August...
Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate — Manoj Murmu v. State of Bihar

Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate — Manoj Murmu v. State of Bihar

Date: Aug 20, 2025
Breathalyzer Outputs as Electronic Records: Patna High Court Mandates Section 65B Certification and Clinical Corroboration; Informant Cannot Investigate Introduction This commentary examines the...
“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial

“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial

Date: Aug 5, 2025
“Equality Above the Bar” – Patna High Court Validates Trial Courts’ Powers to Cancel Bail and Impose Regulatory Conditions on Advocate-Accused to Secure a Speedy Trial 1. Introduction Case: Amber...
Rectification of GST Returns: Right to Amend GSTR-3B in Line with GSTR-1

Rectification of GST Returns: Right to Amend GSTR-3B in Line with GSTR-1

Date: May 14, 2025
Rectification of GST Returns: Right to Amend GSTR-3B in Line with GSTR-1 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Patna High Court’s decision in Om Traders v. Union of India, Civil Writ...
Threshold for RTI Compensation: Demonstrable Loss and Application Requirement under Section 19(8)(b)

Threshold for RTI Compensation: Demonstrable Loss and Application Requirement under Section 19(8)(b)

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Threshold for RTI Compensation: Demonstrable Loss and Application Requirement under Section 19(8)(b) Introduction Amit Anand v. Bihar Information Commission (Patna High Court, 21 April 2025) arises...
Scope of Article 226 in Quashing Dowry Death FIRs: Prima Facie Requirements and CBI Investigation Mandate

Scope of Article 226 in Quashing Dowry Death FIRs: Prima Facie Requirements and CBI Investigation Mandate

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Scope of Article 226 in Quashing Dowry Death FIRs: Prima Facie Requirements and CBI Investigation Mandate Introduction This case arises from Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 181 of 2025 before the...
Non-Issuance of Invoice Bars Extended Limitation for Service Tax Demand under Section 73, Finance Act 1994

Non-Issuance of Invoice Bars Extended Limitation for Service Tax Demand under Section 73, Finance Act 1994

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Non-Issuance of Invoice Bars Extended Limitation for Service Tax Demand under Section 73, Finance Act 1994 Introduction The Patna High Court in Anil Kumar Singh v. The Union of India (Civil Writ...
Empowering Statutory Redressal for Obscene Digital Content: The Nitu Chandra Principle

Empowering Statutory Redressal for Obscene Digital Content: The Nitu Chandra Principle

Date: Apr 19, 2025
Empowering Statutory Redressal for Obscene Digital Content: The Nitu Chandra Principle Introduction In Nitu Chandra v. The Union of India (Patna High Court, 18 April 2025), the petitioning actor and...
Binding Nature of Appellate Directions Under Rule-Saving Provisions: Mandating Appointments Despite Repeals – Ramesh Mahto v. State of Bihar

Binding Nature of Appellate Directions Under Rule-Saving Provisions: Mandating Appointments Despite Repeals – Ramesh Mahto v. State of Bihar

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Binding Nature of Appellate Directions Under Rule-Saving Provisions: Mandating Appointments Despite Repeals Introduction In Ramesh Mahto v. The State of Bihar (Patna High Court, 17 April 2025), a...
Ensuring Recruitment Integrity: Upholding Diploma as the Minimum Qualification under the Pharmacy Act, 1948

Ensuring Recruitment Integrity: Upholding Diploma as the Minimum Qualification under the Pharmacy Act, 1948

Date: Apr 14, 2025
Ensuring Recruitment Integrity: Upholding Diploma as the Minimum Qualification under the Pharmacy Act, 1948 Introduction The Judgment in Abhishek Kumar v. The State of Bihar represents a significant...
Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert